![math is beautiful" "math is elegant" bro what the fuck is this Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics - The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement math is beautiful" "math is elegant" bro what the fuck is this Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics - The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement](https://imageproxy.ifunny.co/crop:x-20,resize:640x,quality:90x75/images/2fc3974a596136e34479ec47fb7d0c00ab1b863a121818395e430cd875181ca0_1.jpg)
math is beautiful" "math is elegant" bro what the fuck is this Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics - The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement
![Optimal sphere packing (2D case). Left: rectangular packing. Right:... | Download Scientific Diagram Optimal sphere packing (2D case). Left: rectangular packing. Right:... | Download Scientific Diagram](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224128702/figure/fig1/AS:670722120773642@1536924023469/Optimal-sphere-packing-2D-case-Left-rectangular-packing-Right-Hexagonal-optimal.png)
Optimal sphere packing (2D case). Left: rectangular packing. Right:... | Download Scientific Diagram
![🌲 cohost.org/arborelia on X: "you can feel the results of this problem in your soul. You look at the optimal packing of 28 squares in a square and say, oh that's nice, 🌲 cohost.org/arborelia on X: "you can feel the results of this problem in your soul. You look at the optimal packing of 28 squares in a square and say, oh that's nice,](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGXDn5_WQAYjruu.png)
🌲 cohost.org/arborelia on X: "you can feel the results of this problem in your soul. You look at the optimal packing of 28 squares in a square and say, oh that's nice,
![Keenan Crane on X: "[1/n] There's been a lot of hubbub lately about the best known packing of 17 unit squares into a larger square, owing to this post: https://t.co/almLPZtOCj I realized Keenan Crane on X: "[1/n] There's been a lot of hubbub lately about the best known packing of 17 unit squares into a larger square, owing to this post: https://t.co/almLPZtOCj I realized](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FpMovTbX0AsTn78.jpg:large)
Keenan Crane on X: "[1/n] There's been a lot of hubbub lately about the best known packing of 17 unit squares into a larger square, owing to this post: https://t.co/almLPZtOCj I realized
![bsky:rezuaq.be on X: "The optimal known packing of 16 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. https://t.co/Ins4o18mcb" / X bsky:rezuaq.be on X: "The optimal known packing of 16 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. https://t.co/Ins4o18mcb" / X](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FpRwdLCXEAItxmz.png)
bsky:rezuaq.be on X: "The optimal known packing of 16 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. https://t.co/Ins4o18mcb" / X
Rob Miles on X: "You have to fit, say, 29 squares into a bigger square. What arrangement is most efficient, i.e maximises the size of the squares? Turns out the optimal arrangements
![Daniel Piker on X: "The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. https://t.co/C0LL4kQzjr" / X Daniel Piker on X: "The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. https://t.co/C0LL4kQzjr" / X](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fo6pFUuXEAIlc5T.png:large)